|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 56 post(s) |
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
25330
   |
Posted - 2014.04.19 00:32:00 -
[1] - Quote
I will probably never own a POS myself but I have to say that removing the standing requirement to anchor a POS in High Security is a very bad idea.
For as long as I've been playing this game, being able to place a POS in High Security is a badge of honor. If a change to the standing requirement is actually needed, (and it's not) then just allow the Corp members modified standing to be used in the Corp standing average. Opening up the rest of High Security to allow POS to be anchored is all fine and dandy but it needs to follow the original standing mechanic for anchoring, ie, same amount of corp standing as the system security level.
What I see happening here is an entire type of player run business being snuffed out of existence. This new change doesn't help the smaller corps and alliances that have worked hard at building up and maintaining Faction standings in order to have a POS in High Sec.
Opening up High Sec systems to anyone with no standing whatsoever to anchor a POS just means more moons for the big power-block Alliances to control.
DMC
Faction Standing Repair Plan | California Eve Players | (Proposal) Bring Back 'The Endless Battle' Missions |
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
25385
|
Posted - 2014.04.20 17:47:00 -
[2] - Quote
Loraine Gess wrote:DeMichael Crimson wrote:I will probably never own a POS myself but I have to say that removing the standing requirement to anchor a POS in High Security is a very bad idea.
For as long as I've been playing this game, being able to place a POS in High Security is a badge of honor. If a change to the standing requirement is actually needed, (and it's not) then just allow the Corp members modified standing to be used in the Corp standing average. Opening up the rest of High Security to allow POS to be anchored is all fine and dandy but it needs to follow the original standing mechanic for anchoring, ie, same amount of corp standing as the system security level.
What I see happening here is an entire type of player run business being snuffed out of existence. This new change doesn't help the smaller corps and alliances that have worked hard at building up and maintaining Faction standings in order to have a POS in High Sec.
Opening up High Sec systems to anyone with no standing whatsoever to anchor a POS just means more moons for the big power-block Alliances to control.
DMC
Nothing stops me (or power blocs much much larger than me) from seeding every moon within 10j of jita with a large offline tower except my will to live Nobody CARES about you
If that were true, then why hasn't it already been done ?
A better question to ask is why do you always go out of your way to troll post ?
Last and most importantly, your opinion is nothing more than typical asshattery anyway.
DMC
Faction Standing Repair Plan | California Eve Players | (Proposal) Bring Back 'The Endless Battle' Missions |
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
25385
|
Posted - 2014.04.20 19:14:00 -
[3] - Quote
Loraine Gess wrote:DeMichael Crimson wrote:Loraine Gess wrote:Nothing stops me (or power blocs much much larger than me) from seeding every moon within 10j of jita with a large offline tower except my will to live
Nobody CARES about you If that were true, then why hasn't it already been done ? A better question to ask is why do you always go out of your way to troll post ? Last and most importantly, your opinion is nothing more than typical asshattery anyway. DMC See: Will to live I have better things to do with my time than to go online 600+ towers, though it is entirely feasible to do so I'd like to ask why you go out of your way to ignore the point entirely, how's that null-sec cartel going, dinsdale?
Sorry Charley, you're like way out there in left field barking up the wrong tree.
DMC
Faction Standing Repair Plan | California Eve Players | (Proposal) Bring Back 'The Endless Battle' Missions |
|
|
| |
|